<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PoliticianScandal.com &#187; Baucus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicianscandal.com/tag/baucus/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicianscandal.com</link>
	<description>Political News &#38; Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Blunder &#8211; How Will Reform Go Wrong?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/231/healthcare-blunder</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/231/healthcare-blunder#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AHIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chamber of commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healtcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/231/healthcare-blunder</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, following a recent AHIP report, has been showing commercials claiming that health insurance prices will skyrocket if the Baucus bill passes in the Senate.[...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/231/healthcare-blunder/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slow Boring of Hard Boards &#8211; Supporters of Status Quo Healthcare</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/219/the-slow-boring-of-hard-boards</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/219/the-slow-boring-of-hard-boards#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astroturf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/219/the-slow-boring-of-hard-boards</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite this really visible opposition to change, or perhaps because of it, I am starting to feel the slightest bit…hmm, what’s the word…un-pessimistic.[...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/219/the-slow-boring-of-hard-boards/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unreliable Sources &#8211; Debating the Public Healthcare Option</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/210/unreliable-sources</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/210/unreliable-sources#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockefeller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate finance committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/210/unreliable-sources</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday’s healthcare debate in the Senate Finance Committee was a dismal spectacle for so many reasons. Two public options were voted down. Sen. Baucus offered no better reason for voting against Sen. Schumer’s public option than his belief that other senators were not going to vote for it when the bill left committee. It was something less than heroic. But the last straw was when Sen. Grassley unabashedly adduced research that wouldn’t pass muster in an A.P. Government class.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/210/unreliable-sources/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Debate &#8211; Tort Reform vs. Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/203/the-great-debate</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/203/the-great-debate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate finance committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/203/the-great-debate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whereas the rhetoric of the House is often transparently insane, the thrust and parry of the senate is endlessly amusing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/203/the-great-debate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

